Automation testing has been an innovative change in the sphere of software development. It surged the much-needed acceleration and accuracy in the testing process. Notwithstanding the many benefits, it has its set of challenges to talk about.

These could be from setting up and configuration at the very beginning, compatibility issues in different environments, or even in maintaining the relevance and efficiency of test scripts over a period of time.

Any organization would find knowledge of these challenges essential in following best practices for automation testing. In this blog, we will take some very common issues that usually arise during automation testing and provide insights into how they can be dealt with effectively.

What is the most challenging part of automation testing?

What is the most challenging part of automation testing for you

The most difficult part of automation is the maintenance. You implement an automation framework, and suddenly tests start failing. You start making excuses and explanations, and pretty soon, you're running at a pass rate of 90%, then 80%, then 70%, and so on.

Before you know it, your automation suite works only sometimes, which is just unacceptable and a lousy use of investment in money, time, and resources.

The return on investment for any automation suite can be tough to maintain, but ways can be found to manage it and keep its value over time. One way to do this is Behavior Based Testing: A visual approach to Behavior Driven Development.

By breaking down test cases into simple components of contexts, events, and outcomes, the test script components become simpler too.

Creating new test scripts becomes easier, and modifying tests as application features and functionalities change is quick and straightforward because you're only adjusting simple components in the automation libraries. I highly recommend looking into BBT and using it with a keyword-based automation framework.

Dealing with Dynamic Elements

One of the most common issues with automation testing is dynamic elements on a web page. Those are elements that change their properties, such as IDs, classes, and values, depending on various conditions like time of the day, user actions, or even changes in the external world.

This variability can cause tests that were stable one day to fail the next without warning. For testers, the challenge is not only identifying these elements but also designing test scripts that can gracefully handle the unpredictability without generating constant false negatives, which can significantly disrupt the testing process.

Maintaining Test Scripts

Maintaining test scripts as applications evolve is another critical challenge in automation testing. As software features expand and change, automation scripts must also be updated to reflect these changes.

This requires regular revisions and can be time-consuming, particularly if the original scripts were not designed with scalability in mind. Additionally, as the amount of test code grows, the risk of defects within the test code itself increases.

This can lead to a scenario where the tool intended to ensure the quality of the product becomes a source of error itself, reducing the overall efficacy of testing efforts.

Strategies to Overcome Automation Testing Challenges

Automation Testing

Implementing Robust Locators

To effectively deal with dynamic elements in automation testing, one useful strategy is implementing robust locators. Locators are what testers use to find elements on a web page; thus, choosing the right type of locator can make a significant difference.

Using XPath functions like \`contains()\`, \`starts-with()\`, or \`last()\` can help create more flexible locators. CSS selectors can also offer more stability compared to absolute paths, which are likely to break with UI changes.

Tools such as Selenium WebDriver allow testers to use various locator strategies, and selecting the most effective one requires understanding the specific dynamics and structure of your web application.

Utilizing Automation Frameworks

Automation frameworks are the tools of necessity for handling and maintaining test automation scripts.

Such frameworks provide a standardized way through which tests can be written, managed, and run to ensure that scripts are easier to maintain and more resistant to changes in the application they are testing.

Popular frameworks, such as Selenium, TestNG, or Cucumber, provide features like data-driven testing, keyword-driven testing, and behavior-driven development, all of which make testing easier to do and help minimize the associated maintenance overhead.

Since they also incorporate many good practices, these frameworks are equally useful for maintaining consistency across teams and projects in terms of testing methodologies.

Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD)

This integration approach to automation testing in a pipeline of Continuous Integration and Delivery will help alleviate some of the challenges pointed out.

In CI/CD, every new commitment of code is accompanied by running automated tests that will provide instant feedback on the effects of changes. This practice allows early detection of defects in the development cycle, hence reducing the cost of bugs and fixing efforts.

It also makes sure that automation scripts are continuously checked and updated with updates of the application to keep the script relevant and effective over a period of time.

Implementing CI/CD requires a well-thought-out workflow and often a cultural shift in the organization but pays off substantially in terms of testing efficiency and software quality.

Best Practices for Successful Automation Testing

Prioritizing Test Cases

The very first step to a successful automation testing process is the proper prioritization of the test cases. Not all tests are equal by nature; some are very important for the core functionality of the application, while others might be less of an impact.

You can do this based on business impact, risk of failure, and frequency of use. Knowing the high-risk areas of your application also helps in the prioritization of test cases that require more rigorous testing.

Properly planned, a prioritization strategy can work out where to maximize resources and time effectively in the workplace by focusing on where they are most needed and likely to return the best results.

Regular Review and Maintenance of Test Scripts

Automation testing is not a one-time thing. Rather, it should be regularly checked and updated for its continued effectiveness. Keeping up with changes to the application, review and maintenance of test scripts is necessary.

Interfaces might change, functionalities may get updated, or new requirements could add to the application that would render the existing scripts obsolete or inaccurate.

Scheduled reviews of the scripts can help in detection as to which scripts need an update to have a robust and reliable automation suite.

Moreover, this best practice may prevent the introduction of technical debt, which is expensive and time-consuming to handle later.

Collaboration between Development and Testing Teams

Good collaboration is required between the development and testing teams for successful automation testing.

Besides, communication and collaboration give a double perspective view of the application, thereby increasing test coverage in general while discovering potential problems early.

The developers can share insights regarding the code, which can come in really handy for a tester while writing efficient test scripts.

On the other hand, testers can inform the developers regarding defects and shortcomings on the fly, thereby making it easier to deal with issues on the go for quick fix-ups and smoother iterations.

Regular meetings, combined toolsets, and shared documentation can engender a more collaborative atmosphere and, therefore, improve quality and efficiency overall.

Book a Demo and experience ContextQA testing tool in action with a complimentary, no-obligation session tailored to your business needs.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

As we have seen, automation testing is not an easy task. The list of challenges is long: from the choice and configuration of tools to the maintenance of tests and guarantees of their effectiveness in case of changes in applications.

Knowing these common obstacles and their mitigation strategies ahead of time, however, should let teams really use automation to improve software quality and efficiency.

After all, the benefits brought by automation testing, like faster releases, better coverage, and increased ROI, far outweigh the initial complexities.

Once these challenges are met upfront with clear strategies and continual learning, success will ensue in this highly competitive business area of software development.

Also Read - 3 Strategies to Improve Software Quality | Blog | SQAsquared

We make it easy to get started with the ContextQA tool: Start Free Trial.