It is very important to ensure that a software product is of good quality and can perform its functions before its release in the complex world of software development.
Test coverage techniques form the key to answering which parts of the code have been thoroughly tested and what is potentially in need of improvement.
These methods help in validating application behavior and increase confidence among developers and stakeholders about the quality of the output software product.
Different methods of test coverage can be used to ensure a more robust, reliable, and error-free software application.
This blog details the top eight test coverage techniques that must be part of any software testing strategy and is aimed at improving understanding and implementation in your testing regimes.
Understanding Test Coverage Techniques
The gamut of test coverage techniques in software testing becomes very critical to ensure comprehensive assessment and validation of code and functionalities before the products hit the market.
These practices are aimed at testing the various dimensions of a software application, either the code itself, the functionality in response to inputs, or the behavior in different surroundings or states.
The following sections describe some test techniques for building a robust strategy for software testing.
Code Coverage
Code coverage is a quantitative measure used to describe the degree to which the source code of a program is executed when a particular test suite runs. It provides a more granular view of testing completeness.
A high rate of code coverage implies more code paths, decisions, and conditions within the application are tested, potentially leading to higher software quality. Common metrics used in code coverage include:
- Statement Coverage: Measures the number of executed lines of code compared to the total.
- Branch Coverage: Assesses whether the true and false branches on decision points are executed.
- Function Coverage: Analyzes if all functions or methods in the code have been called during testing.
Increasing code coverage can uncover hidden software bugs and prevent future maintenance issues, making it a fundamental technique in software development and maintenance.
Functional Testing
Functional testing focuses on the business requirements of an application. It is performed to ensure that the software operates according to its design specifications.
In functional testing, the functionalities are tested by feeding them inputs and examining the output.
This type of testing is critical for verifying that the software is indeed solving the problem it was intended to solve and can include:
- User Interface Testing: Ensuring that the interface meets requirements and users can interact with it as expected.
- Database Testing: Verifying that databases perform data manipulations correctly.
- Security Testing: Checks for the software’s adherence to security protocols.
Functional testing can either be manual or automated and is pivotal in the early detection of software malfunctions.
Regression Testing
It is one of the testing techniques in software testing, which involves checking that changes to the software do not have adverse effects on existing functionality.
When updates in an existent application are made, one needs to make sure that the new code complements the older one without faults. Regression testing goals include:
- Catch bugs introduced by recent code modifications.
- Verify that previous functionalities work post the changes.
- Ensure the changed code interacts correctly with the untouched areas of the system.
This testing is often automated to continually recheck the application after each change, helping maintain stability in the software's operation over time.
Branch Coverage
Branch coverage is a subset of code coverage that focuses on ensuring that each one of the possible branches from each decision point is executed at least once.
This technique is useful in identifying untested parts of a code base, which might turn into defects. By implementing branch and decision coverage, teams can:
- Ensure all outcomes from conditions are tested.
- Identify and enhance testing on critical decision points in the code.
- Increase the overall quality and reliability of the software product.
Branch coverage extends beyond simple code execution, demanding that the software is tested through various flows and conditions.
Boundary Value Analysis
Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) is a type of black-box testing technique that involves creating test cases for boundary values. These boundary values include input conditions at the limits, just within/outside the limits, typical values, and edge cases.
BVA is particularly effective because errors often occur at the boundaries rather than the middle of input domains. Applying BVA ensures that:
- Inputs at the edges are validated systematically.
- Potential weaknesses at boundary conditions are exploited to check robustness.
- Functional handling of input ranges can be assessed critically.
BVA can greatly reduce the number of test cases necessary to cover all pertinent input scenarios, making it efficient and effective.
Equivalence Partitioning
Equivalence Partitioning (EP) is another black-box testing method where inputs are divided into logically similar groups that are expected to exhibit similar behavior.
Thus, only one condition from each partition is tested to save time and effort while covering necessary scenarios. Equivalence partitioning helps in:
- Reducing the number of tests run while maintaining reasonable coverage.
- Identifying errors in applications quicker by focusing on representative values.
- Simplifying comprehensive testing and making it more manageable.
EP is generally used in conjunction with Boundary Value Analysis to achieve thorough testing of functional inputs.
Decision Table Testing
Decision Table Testing is used to look at complex business logic that can be influenced by various inputs, presenting a systematic approach to capture and evaluate different combinations of conditions and their corresponding actions.
This form of testing is particularly useful when the application needs to follow multiple rules or when the logic is intertwined. Benefits include:
- Clear visualization of cause-effect relationships, easing the understanding of functionalities.
- Coverage of all possible scenarios, especially useful in complex systems.
- Facilitation of communication among team members regarding different functional scenarios.
This technique ensures that all business rules and decisions are tested comprehensively, leaving little room for unexpected behavior in live environments.
Use Case Testing
Use Case Testing involves creating tests based on the use cases, which describe a system’s typical interactions with users including sequences of events and exceptional conditions.
It is rooted deeply in user perspective, making it excellent for catching errors in real-world scenarios. This testing type can:
- Align tests with actual user requirements and expected interactions.
- Address not only general operations but also error and exception handling.
- Validate the completeness of a software application in terms of its functionality.
Use Case testing helps developers and testers focus on what end-users will actually experience, therefore ensuring bug-free, friendly, and functional software.
Book a Demo and experience ContextQA testing platform in action with a complimentary, no-obligation session tailored to your business needs.
Conclusion
Test coverage techniques are essential to ensure comprehensive quality assurance in software testing.
These methods are about code coverage, functional testing, and regression testing, which can be used to point out lacunae in the test cases, check functionality against user requirements, and maintain system integrity with respect to time.
Such techniques, when implemented, bring improvement not only to the reliability of the software but also to the efficiency of the testing process. Improve your software performance and reliability by adopting these test coverage techniques.
Also Read - What is Jenkins Pipeline and Jenkins CI:CD pipeline types