Pricing
Pricing built around your testing footprint, not a seat count
Every team's mix of apps, AI agents, and release cadence is different — so is the right plan. Talk to us for 20 minutes and we'll size a plan to what you actually need to test.
No card required. No seat tax. A real conversation, not a price calculator.
Trusted by teams shipping with confidence
Plans
Three ways to start, one way to grow
Every plan is AI-native from day one. What changes is breadth of coverage, governance, and how hands-on we are with you.
Starter
For teams proving out AI-native testing on a first app or two, fast.
- AI-generated test cases from plain English or Jira
- Web, mobile, and API testing
- Self-healing tests out of the box
- Code export to Playwright, Selenium, Cypress
- CI/CD integration (GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins)
- Community & Slack support
Most popular
Growth
For teams scaling automation across releases, environments, and pipelines.
- Everything in Starter, plus
- AI root-cause analysis on every failure
- Visual regression & performance testing
- MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code
- Continuous testing across pipelines
- Priority support with SLA response times
Enterprise
For regulated, multi-team orgs that need governance, scale, and a dedicated partner.
- Everything in Growth, plus
- Salesforce, SAP & ERP testing
- AI agent & voice agent testing
- SSO, on-prem, and security hardening
- Multi-project & multi-team governance
- Dedicated CSM & 24/7 enterprise SLA
Why teams switch
Built AI-native, not bolted on
A quick look at how ContextQA's core architecture differs from legacy automation tools.
| Capability | ContextQA | Other testing tools |
|---|---|---|
| AI test creation | AI-native agents generate tests from Jira, Figma, Swagger, video, or plain English | AI features often bolted onto an older record-and-playback or scripting core |
| Self-healing | Built in from day one | Basic locator healing, or none — manual upkeep as the app changes |
| MCP / AI-agent | MCP server (~50 tools) for Claude, Cursor, VS Code | Limited or no agentic / MCP interface |
| Code export | Clean export to Playwright, Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO | Often locked to a proprietary format or the vendor's own runner |
| Pricing model | Usage / outcome-based, sized to your team | Per-seat licensing, or quote-only billed by parallel execution |
| Learning curve | Low — plain English + agentic generation | Steeper — a proprietary scripting language or custom syntax to learn |
Every plan includes
Enterprise-grade from Starter up
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
GDPR compliant
Runs in your cloud
Per-project isolation
FAQ
Pricing, answered
ContextQA is priced on usage and outcomes — what you actually test, not how many people log in. There's no per-seat tax, so QA, engineering, and product can all use it without a bigger bill. We size a plan to your apps, release cadence, and AI-agent footprint on a short call.
Because a flat number would be misleading. A team testing one web app and a team testing Salesforce, SAP, and a fleet of AI agents have very different footprints — a single sticker price would either overcharge the first or undercharge the second. A quick conversation gets you a number that's actually right for you.
Yes. Most teams start with a scoped pilot on a real app in your environment, so you can see ContextQA generate and self-heal tests against your own product before committing to anything.
We look at your stack (web, mobile, API, Salesforce, SAP, AI agents, whatever applies), show ContextQA generating and running tests against something close to your real app, and walk through which tier and rollout plan fits. No slide-deck pitch, no pressure to decide on the call.
Yes, plans are meant to move with you. Most teams start on Starter or Growth for one or two apps, then expand into Enterprise once Salesforce/SAP testing, SSO, or multi-team governance become relevant. Your CSM handles the transition, not a support ticket.
Per-seat tools charge more as more people need access, which quietly discourages QA, dev, and product from sharing one source of truth. ContextQA's usage-based model means adding teammates doesn't add cost — see the full Katalon comparison for the breakdown.
Let's find the plan that actually fits
Bring your stack, your release cadence, and your hardest testing problem. We'll leave the call with a plan sized to it — not a generic tier.